Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)DA
Posts
0
Comments
20
Joined
1 yr. ago
  • You seem deaf to what I'm saying. There are cultural tensions involved. Yes people choose their ethical compliances but those choices are always constrained by cultural, educational, and structural bounds. The cultural messaging of the time.

    Before this generation were the first school shooters, before them it was satanic panic related crimes, before them it was the first post WW2 street gangs.

    These are all topics that insert violence into cultural frameworks without having the necessary discussions of causes and the messaging around these.

  • So the anti-terror laws have been used before and apply to all terrorism..

    My comment is mocking that incel - which basically means single and upset about it, is being made central to the headline.

    Just say he's a misogynist. Pretending it's something abnormal for single men to not have sex just extends the premise of "incels".

  • PNAT laws increase the severity of all terrorism related prosecutions. They aren't aimed at "incels" in particular.

    Hitler, great replacement, and communicating with women, aren't incel traits. That last one in particular.

    That's far-right.

    Plenty of leftwing incels.

  • The charges were terror related, there's no special extra charge or any new laws being used "for the first time" just because he was an incel...

    ...also he wasn't an incel, he was a far-right praising hitler fear of the great replacement teenager.

    Pretending that women sleeping with people like that will stop them doing crimes or is somehow a pivotal factor just extends the sex obsessed and objectifying beliefs of that world view.

    Using the term incel amplifies the idea that it's a valid idea.It's a shitty headline, so I mocked it.

    Incel describes most single people.

  • Everyone on the planet needs to send the same message to Russia: Your warm water ports in Crimea will be useless, drones would just sink your fleet each year.

    Same for any mining minerals operations you managed to set up. The prize you're trying to capture is no longer worth keeping it. Go home.

    The change in the nature of war has made the spoils into liabilities. Drones will keep the world's borders set for some time now.

  • Not quite, because the reason they don't want to buy from overseas is because they've had three decades trapped in a deflation crisis. So every time they buy anything from overseas it shows the weak buying power of the Japanese yen (which is a product of the deflationary "lost years").

    ...so there's a unique economic context for why they're acting this way.

  • But this kind of statement is more like America being the spokesperson for Russia. Which isn't far from funding the return strike.

    ... and if America starts funding Russia against Ukraine... And Europe is funding Ukraine, then you have a proxy war of America against Europe.

    That's what I mean by war with Europe.