Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)IN
IndustryStandard
  • The protesters on the square did not get shot. The Western media confirms nobody of the peaceful protesters on the square got killed.

    Violent rioters who stoned and burnt police did get killed. On day4. There weer already multiple police killed on day3. Even Western media acknowledges all of what I am saying happened.

    The censorship of the event also speaks a great deal about who's fault it is.

    The amazing amount of misinformation being spread here says a lot more about how insane the Western brainwashing machine is.

  • Armed rioters burning cops alive are not "student protesters".

    The US media somehow manages to switch the two around for their propaganda purposes.

    You apparently cannot tell the difference either.

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

    Demonstrators attacked troops with poles, rocks, and molotov cocktails; Jeff Widener reported witnessing rioters setting fire to military vehicles and beating the soldiers inside them to death.[178] On one avenue in western Beijing, anti-government protestors torched a military convoy of more than 100 trucks and armored vehicles.[179] They also hijacked an armored personnel carrier, taking it on a joy ride. These scenes were captured on camera and broadcast by Chinese state television.[180]

    Good old peaceful demonstration strikes again. Luckily those students were not doing anything violent such as holding up a Palestine flag. Then the US media would tell us how violence against them is fully justified

  • Never seen again means: nobody saw him again. This means you would know who it is. Which you do not. If the army wanted to run him over they would have simply run him over.

  • The death toll of Tiannenmen riots is around 300. You would think it was 300.000 from the amound of posts we see about it.

    Current casualty count in Gaza is about 200 times higher than Tiannenmen.

  • Oh no he pulls out the image implying that the tank ran over a protester on the square!

    But he forgets that there is a video

    Of a man who blacks tanks driving away from the square... and... climbing on top of a military vehicle???!!

    What do you think would happen in America to someone who climbed on top of a tank and opened the hatch? And even still he did not get shot but simply escorted away. Amazing.

  • "Students" hahaha. Nice of you to leave out that the rioters started attacking the police first and literally burned police officiers alive. The peaceful protesters at the square were not attacked.

    There are actual events you can point to in which China represses their population. This is probably the dumbest one because extreme restraint was shown from the Chinese authorities.

    If it was America the guy blocking the tank from leaving the square would have been run over. And you would probably be screaming fafo.

  • Never forget when the CIA organised an armed color revolution which resulted into people shooting at the Chinese military. The clashes outsider of the square, not on it as the name suggests, resulted in a total of around 300 deaths.

    Tiananmen has to be the dumbest propaganda pount because it is so incredibly easy to debunk for anyone who has basic access to a search machine. The CIA literally admitted they backed the riots.

    The sheer hypocrisy of posting this while the American government is arming a live streamed genocide with over 60.000, likely more than 200.00p killed.

  • Three killed as Israeli forces open fire near Gaza food distribution site, officials say
    Israeli forces in the Gaza Strip opened fire as people headed towards a food distribution site a kilometre away at around sunrise on Monday, killing at least three people and injuring dozens, health officials and a witness said. The military said it fired warning shots at “suspects” who approached its forces. The shooting occurred at the same location where witnesses say Israeli forces fired a day earlier on crowds of people heading towards the food distribution hub in southern Gaza run by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on Monday toward “several suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them,” around a kilometre (1,000 yards) away from the food distribution site at a time when it was closed. The army denied it was preventing people from reaching the site.
    Читать далее
    Benjamin Netanyahu accused of shielding Jewish terrorists
    Investigations into Jewish terrorism are being obstructed by Benjamin Netanyahu, Haaretz has uncovered in a new investigation. According to the report, the Israeli prime minister personally intervened to block Israel’s Shin Bet security agency from pursuing surveillance and wiretaps on Jewish extremists suspected of committing terror attacks against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. The move has sparked alarm inside Israel’s security establishment, with senior officials describing it as “unprecedented” and “dangerous”. The revelations, published by Haaretz, expose how Netanyahu’s far-right government has provided political cover to extremist settlers, granting them impunity to escalate violence and terrorise Palestinians. This obstruction of justice, security officials warn, risks undermining national security and emboldening Jewish terrorists.
    Читать далее
    US sanctions will not bring peace to Sudan
    The Organization of Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ( OPCW), of which Sudan is a member of its executive committee, has a rigorous fact finding process that includes requesting clarification from any state of possible breaches and sending experts for inspection on the ground and finally sharing the report with the public. **In the current case of Sudan this never took place**; the only available information is a new report by The New York Times that references four US officials speaking under the condition of anonymity of the Sudanese army using these weapons. Another report by a recently formed local organisation, with no disclosure of its funding, claiming that chemical weapons were used in Khartoum and Darfur by the army. Significantly, they have not provided a single shred of evidence. In a similar case, another organisation shared a photo of a grenade launcher made by the China North Industries Group Corporation Limited (Norinco), claiming it was used by Sudanese soldiers with the banned sulfur mustard gas before starting a battle in Khartoum. An independent news platform debunked this photo and showed the weapon could not be used to launch chemical weapons. It is hard to overlook the influence of the UAE— the RSF militia’s main sponsor and a key military and financial partner of the US—in shaping this decision. As the Sudanese army gains significant ground on the battlefield, it is in the UAE’s interest to undermine its reputation and leverage its connections to diminish its power.
    Читать далее
    Top This Month