Pretty simple. Currently not all nations have nukes, out of those who have, a few have enough to completely destroy a rival nation. This means that the nations with the big nuke stocks are the ones calling the shots as to who should have nukes and how much. Iran being mostly against the US is not allowed nukes, Israel being mostly a US ally is allowed nukes.

This is the unpolitical explanation.

I guess it's easy to say behind a keyboard, but still feels fucked up, was that really the lesser evil?

I get making deals to acquire useful information, but immunity? The deals should have been life in prison instead of execution.

I guess even a crazy stupid clock is accurate sometimes

Sure, because as everyone knows, theses cases are so clear cut and there is alwas a good side that does no wrong and a bad side that does only wrong.

Maybe you are too close to the problem, I don't know your story, but from the side it is obvious that the 7.10 was hate fueled terrorism (you can see them even shooting friendly dogs) just as it is clear that right now there is a genocide going on.

What a load of BS. It was a terrorist attack on civilians.

The Israel-Palestine conflict has been goibg on for long, Israel is to blame for a lot of it, some of the attacks by Hamas can be categorized as resistance, the 7.10 was a pure terrorist attack, no two ways about it.

Targeting civilians based on which side of the border they reside in is a terrorist attack, this applies to both sides. On the 7th Hamas murdered who ever they found, including Muslims.

It's a joke...

Votes were always political BS, they ban a bunch of very legitimate things like the pride flag and Palestine flag, yet they don't mind having a country in the process of committing genocide in it.

Look, the 7.10 was terrible, Israel had every right to fight back. But genocide is genocide and it is not self defense.

Fuck Hamas, fuck Israel and fuck the Eurovision.