“Enough is enough, I’ve had it with these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane. Everybody strap in. I’m about to open some freakin’ windows, mate.”

Edibles cause the body to metabolize 11-hydroxy-THC in the liver, which does not happen when weed is smoked. Due to this, edibles can be stronger than smoked weed, and they can be overwhelming even for experienced stoners.

It is a common rookie mistake to think the brownie sounds friendlier than the joint—any novice pothead should consider smoking or vapes for controllable and predictable dosing, while edibles are better suited for the ride or die heads who have experience with surfing high levels of intoxication.

Neither one will kill you, both should be legal.

I imagine it was to manipulate the 9 year old into thinking they were real married.

In my opinion, the people in LA are human and normal—opposing oppressors is one of the most natural reactions any animal can have.

I hear the spirit of what you’re saying, and don’t oppose it with any venom, but I also think that it would take a smaller number of privileged liberals getting shot with rubber bullets to create massive outrage than revolutionary leftists. It will be cool if things can work with just a warning dire warning of numbers, but it will also be incredibly useful to the cause if the cops fuck this one up.

I don’t say this lightly, my own mother will be there and I would never want her to be hurt, but I also know how much it would motivate her bourgeois friends if she experienced even a waft of teargas. Much like republicans, centrists are most strongly motivated when circumstances hit them directly.

Of course, it’s literally the least I can do. The only other option is to do nothing, and that is unacceptable, in my book.

Not today, Satan.

I will be exceedingly disappointed if it is another inert collection of liberals who are only there to pat themselves on the back and get shots for the gram like the women’s march was. LA should be the example, not the cautionary tale. Make these bastards feel it, and don’t make it easy.

“US shows itself if there is anything worth saving.”

My point is that it is within the realm of normal annoyances from other people and there should be a reasonable expectation of both politeness from the smoker and tolerance from others. A strong perfume, a fart, body odor, spicy food, and many other gasses can be encountered at any point from a similar distance, but nobody suggests punishing people for those.

I find the desire to over legislate things due to personal preferences about how other people behave is a bigger and more annoying vice than smoking.

Like outside more than 10 feet from a doorway? Surely 10 feet is enough to change your walking path and save yourself from a waft.

Everyone forces their vice on bystanders in some capacity. I consider censorship and Puritanism to be a vice that is forced in nearly every aspect of society. It’s moral fetishism.

Between the two, I’d rather see someone smoke a cigarettes than be judgmental towards others.

School playground might be a bit much, but I unironically support your right to sun your anus in the park. We all have them, we shouldn’t be ashamed.

So where do you fall on the natural tobacco brands?

I don’t smoke, but I also don’t want to live in a world where you can’t.

I don’t smoke.

Anybody who thinks they are breathing clean air just because they banned smoking is kidding themselves. At least the cigarette makes the smoker happy and causes minimal damage to passersby when smoked outside—meanwhile the massive air pollution that companies emit is shortening lifespans of every breather across the globe.

Sure, don’t smoke inside, whatever, but the criminalization and exclusion of addictive behavior is bullshit, in my opinion, especially when it comes in the form of pearl clutching “for the children”.

If you can’t smoke outdoors and you can’t smoke indoors, where can you smoke?